4.2 Article

Surgical repair of subaortic stenosis resection: 10 years of single-center experience in 65 patients

Journal

JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY
Volume 36, Issue 10, Pages 3593-3598

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jocs.15886

Keywords

congenital heart disease; left ventricular outflow tract; reoperation; subaortic stenosis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This retrospective study analyzed SAS patients undergoing resection and found that the surgical outcomes were poorer in the complex lesion group, with a higher likelihood of requiring reoperation post-surgery. Regular follow-up is recommended to monitor the condition of patients after surgery.
Background Subaortic stenosis (SAS) was a rare congenital heart disease of left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT), ranging from isolated lesions to tunnel or diffuse lesions. We conducted a retrospective study to describe the characteristics of patients with different lesions and analyze the risk factors for reoperation. Methods In this study, we examined a single-center retrospective cohort of SAS patients undergoing resection from 2010 to 2019. Patients were classified as simple lesion group (n = 37) or complex lesion group (n = 28). Demographics, perioperative findings, and clinical data were analyzed. Results The surgical effect of the two groups was significantly lower than that before the operation (p < .05). The median age at operation was 6 (3-11.8) years. There was no operative mortality. In complex lesion group, cardiopulmonary bypass time (CPB time), aortic cross-clamping time (ACC time), mechanical ventilation time, and intensive care unit (ICU) stay time were longer. The median follow-up period was 2.8 years (range: 1-3.8), with two late death. Six patients (9.2%) required reoperation due to restenosis or severe aortic insufficiency. The freedom from reoperation rates at 5 years was 66.7% for simple lesion but only 52.3% for complex lesion (p = .036). Conclusions Although the lesions include many forms, SAS resection was still satisfactory. However, the reoperation after initial surgical treatment was not infrequent, especially in patients with complex lesion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available