4.6 Article

Mitigation on bowel loops daily variations by 1.5-T MR-guided daily-adaptive SBRT for abdomino-pelvic lymph-nodal oligometastases

Journal

JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 147, Issue 11, Pages 3269-3277

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00432-021-03739-8

Keywords

MR-linac; Oligometastases; Lymph node; MRgRT; Adaptive radiotherapy; SBRT; Intra-fraction variability

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study reported preliminary dosimetric data on the use of 1.5T MR-guided daily-adaptive radiotherapy for abdomino-pelvic lymph-nodal oligometastases. The technology showed potential in improving target coverage and reducing OARs risks, especially in significantly sparing single intestinal loops.
Purpose We report preliminary dosimetric data concerning the use of 1.5-T MR-guided daily-adaptive radiotherapy for abdomino-pelvic lymph-nodal oligometastases. We aimed to assess the impact of this technology on mitigating daily variations for both target coverage and organs-at-risk (OARs) sparing. Methods A total of 150 sessions for 30 oligometastases in 23 patients were analyzed. All patients were treated with MR-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for a total dose of 35 Gy in five fractions. For each fraction, a quantitative analysis was performed for PTV volume, V35Gy and D-mean. Similarly, for OARs, we assessed daily variations of volume, D-mean, D-max. Any potential statistically significant change between baseline planning and daily-adaptive sessions was assessed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, assuming a p value < 0.05 as significant. Results Average baseline PTV, bowel, bladder, and single intestinal loop volumes were respectively 8.9 cc (range 0.7-41.2 cc), 1176 cc (119-3654 cc), 95 cc (39.7-202.9 cc), 18.3 cc (9.1-37.7 cc). No significant volume variations were detected for PTV (p = 0.21) bowel (p = 0.36), bladder (p = 0.47), except for single intestinal loops, which resulted smaller (p = 0.026). Average baseline V35Gy and D-mean for PTV were respectively 85.6% (72-98.8%) and 35.6 Gy (34.6-36.1 Gy). We recorded a slightly positive trend in favor of daily-adaptive strategy vs baseline planning for improved target coverage, although not reaching statistical significance (p = 0.11 and p = 0.18 for PTV-V35Gy and PTV-D-mean). Concerning OARs, a significant difference was observed in favor of daily-adapted treatments in terms of single intestinal loop D-max [23.05 Gy (13.2-26.9 Gy) at baseline vs 20.5 Gy (12.1-24 Gy); p value = 0.0377] and D-mean [14.4 Gy (6.5-18 Gy) at baseline vs 13.0 Gy (6.7-17.6 Gy); p value = 0.0003]. Specifically for bladder, the average D-max was 18.6 Gy (0.4-34.3 Gy) at baseline vs 18.3 Gy (0.7-34.3 Gy) for a p value = 0.28; the average D-mean was 7.0 Gy (0.2-16.6 Gy) at baseline vs 6.98 Gy (0.2-16.4 Gy) for a p value = 0.66. Concerning the bowel, no differences in terms of D-mean [4.78 Gy (1.3-10.9 Gy) vs 5.6 Gy (1.4-10.5 Gy); p value = 0.23] were observed between after daily-adapted sessions. A statistically significant difference was observed for bowel D-max [26.4 Gy (7.7-34 Gy) vs 25.8 Gy (7.8-33.1 Gy); p value = 0.0086]. Conclusions Daily-adaptive MR-guided SBRT reported a significantly improved single intestinal loop sparing for lymph-nodal oligometastases. Also, bowel D-max was significantly reduced with daily-adaptive strategy. A minor advantage was also reported in terms of PTV coverage, although not statistically significant.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available