4.7 Article

Quantitative structure-activity relationship and machine learning studies of 2-thiazolylhydrazone derivatives with anti-Cryptococcus neoformans activity

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMOLECULAR STRUCTURE & DYNAMICS
Volume 40, Issue 20, Pages 9789-9800

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/07391102.2021.1935321

Keywords

Antifungal agents; thiazolylhydrazones; Cryptococcus neoformans; QSAR; 2D-QSAR; 4D-QSAR; machine learning; random; forest; ligand-based drug; design (LBDD)

Funding

  1. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais
  2. Pro-Reitoria de Pesquisa, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study suggests that aliphatic substituents at the hydrazone moiety are crucial for the antifungal activity of thiazolylhydrazones. Modern techniques were used to create QSAR models with high predictive power, supporting the design of new antifungal compounds.
Cryptococcus neoformans is a fungus responsible for infections in humans with a significant number of cases in immunosuppressed patients, mainly in underdeveloped countries. In this context, the thiazolylhydrazones are a promising class of compounds with activity against C. neoformans. The understanding of the structure-activity relationship of these derivatives could lead to the design of robust compounds that could be promising drug candidates for fungal infections. Specifically, modern techniques such as 4D-QSAR and machine learning methods were employed in this work to generate two QSAR models (one 2D and one 4D) with high predictive power (r2 for the test set equals to 0.934 and 0.831, respectively), and one random forest classification model was reported with Matthews correlation coefficient equals to 1 and 0.62 for internal and external validations, respectively. The physicochemical interpretation of selected models, indicated the importance of aliphatic substituents at the hydrazone moiety to antifungal activity, corroborating experimental data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available