4.5 Article

Laser-induced cavitation in plasmonic nanoparticle solutions: A comparative study between gold and titanium nitride

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART A
Volume 109, Issue 12, Pages 2483-2492

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.37242

Keywords

laser-induced cavitation; nonlinear absorption; nonthermal plasma; shockwave emission

Funding

  1. U.S. Army Research Office [W911NF-17-1-0340]
  2. University of California Institute for Mexico
  3. United States (UCMEXUS)
  4. US Department of Education GAANN [P200A180037]
  5. National Science Foundation [PIRE 1545852, EEC 1941543]
  6. U.S. Army

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study demonstrates that titanium nitride nanoparticles exhibit high stability and nonlinear absorption, making them promising for various applications. Compared to gold nanorods, titanium nitride also shows plasma formation at lower laser energies.
In this work, we present an extensive comparative study between novel titanium nitride nanoparticles (TiN NPs) and commercial gold nanorods (GNR), both dispersed in water and exposed to a pulsed laser-induced cavitation process. The optical density, shockwave emission, and bubble formation of these solutions were investigated using shadowgraphy, spatial transmittance modulation, and acoustic measurements. TiN nanoparticle solutions exhibited high stability undser a periodic nanosecond pulsed-laser irradiation, making these nanomaterials promising agents for high-power applications. In addition, they demonstrated a stronger nonlinear absorption compared to the GNR solutions, and plasma formation at lower laser energies. This study advances our understanding of the optical properties of TiN and discusses significant differences compared to gold, with important implications for future applications of this material in water treatment, nonlinear signal converting, and laser-induced cavitation for medical implementations, among others.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available