4.2 Article

Computational Modeling of Voice Production Using Excised Canine Larynx

Publisher

ASME
DOI: 10.1115/1.4052226

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH from the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD) [R01DC009435]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A combined experimental-numerical work was conducted to validate a subject-specific continuum model of voice production in larynx. The simulations predicted key features observed in the experiments, but there were discrepancies in quantitative predictions, leading to discussions on the limitations of the model.
A combined experimental-numerical work was conducted to comprehensively validate a subject-specific continuum model of voice production in larynx using excised canine laryngeal experiments. The computational model is a coupling of the Navier-Stokes equations for glottal flow dynamics and a finite element model of vocal fold dynamics. The numerical simulations employed a cover-body vocal fold structure with the geometry reconstructed from magnetic resonance imaging scans and the material properties determined through an optimization-based inverse process of experimental indentation measurement. The results showed that the simulations predicted key features of the dynamics observed in the experiments, including the skewing of the glottal flow waveform, mucosal wave propagation, continuous increase of the divergent angle and intraglottal swirl strength during glottal closing, and flow recirculation between glottal jet and vocal fold. The simulations also predicted the increase of the divergent angle, glottal jet speed, and intraglottal flow swirl strength with the subglottal pressure, same as in the experiments. Quantitatively, the simulations over-predicted the frequency and jet speed and underpredicted the flow rate and divergent angle for the larynx under study. The limitations of the model and their implications were discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available