Journal
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY
Volume 36, Issue 11, Pages 3788-3795Publisher
CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE INC MEDICAL PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.07.004
Keywords
open payments; adult reconstruction; industry; conflict of interest; Sunshine Act
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study found a nonsignificant increasing trend in payments to adult reconstruction-trained orthopedic surgeons, as well as an increasing number of surgeons receiving payments. There were increasing trends in median payment per surgeon for education and entertainment expenses, but a decreasing trend for honoraria payments. The majority of the top 5 companies had nonsignificant trends in their payments.
Background: In recent time, there has been an increased push toward transparency in industry funding toward physicians. The Physician Payments Sunshine Act called for the creation of the Open Payments Database managed by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. To our knowledge, there have been no studies evaluating the trends in payments among adult reconstruction fellowship-trained orthopedic surgeons. The purpose of this study is to investigate trends in all payments to adult reconstruction trained orthopedic surgeons from 2014 to 2019. Secondary outcomes included evaluating trends in yearly subpayment categories, regional variations, as well as characterizing the top 5 industry companies. Methods: A review of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Open Payments Database was performed to identify all payments to adult reconstruction-trained orthopedic surgeons. A total of 94,265 payments were made to 4911 surgeons accounting for a total of $258,865,231.20 during the study period. Our primary outcome was to assess the trend in median payment per year to individual surgeons. Secondary outcomes included evaluating payment trends with respect to subtype, location as defined by United States Census regions, as well as specifics concerning the top 5 companies. Results: Over the study period, there was a nonsignificant increasing trend in median payment per surgeon (r = 0.49, P = .096). However, there was also a significantly increasing trend in the number of payments per year (r = 0.83, P = .014), as well as the number of surgeons receiving payments (r = 0.88, P = .019). With respect to subcategory payments, there were significantly increasing trends in the median payment per surgeon for education (1054%, r = 0.942, P < .001) and entertainment/food and beverage expenses (20.2%, r = 0.49, P = .020), as well as a significantly decreasing trend for median honoraria payments per surgeon (20.2%, r =-0.04, P = .005). No significant regional trends were identified. Of the top 5 companies, one demonstrated a significantly decreasing trend in median payment per surgeon (21.6%, r =-0.109, P < .001), whereas the others remained unchanged. Conclusion: In this study, we found a nonsignificant increasing trend in payments to adult reconstruction-trained surgeons as well as an increasing number of surgeons receiving payments. There were increasing trends in median payment per surgeon for education and entertainment expenses, but a decreasing trend for honoraria payments. No significant regional trends were identified. The majority of the top 5 companies had nonsignificant trends in their payments. Further studies are needed to characterize the disclosure of payments and the impact of industry payments on clinical outcomes. Level of Evidence: IV. (c) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available