4.1 Article

Rice Bran Hydrolysates Minimize Freeze-Denaturation of Washed Fish Mince during Extended Freeze-Thaw Cycles

Journal

JOURNAL OF AQUATIC FOOD PRODUCT TECHNOLOGY
Volume 30, Issue 8, Pages 944-953

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10498850.2021.1958968

Keywords

Rice bran; hydrolysate; cryoprotectant; frozen; rheology

Funding

  1. OSU Seafood Research & Education Center, Oregon State University, USA
  2. Center of Excellence in Food Science and Innovation, Faculty of Science and Technology, Thammasat University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

RBH can effectively protect the quality of frozen fish proteins, especially when blended with S/S.
Rice bran hydrolysate (RBH) was produced from hexane-defatted rice bran using subcritical alkaline water followed by enzymatic hydrolysis (Protease G6 at 2% for 6 hr). The RBH was added to Pacific whiting washed mince. The physicochemical and rheological properties of the mince with and without RBH or commercial cryoprotectants (sucrose-sorbitol (S/S)) were evaluated after 0, 7, and 14 freeze-thaw (FT) cycles. The protein solubility and total sulfhydryl group content of all samples decreased as the number of FT cycles increased, while surface hydrophobicity increased. Samples prepared with 2% RBH mixed with 4% S/S (RBH+S/S) and 2% RBH exhibited higher total sulfhydryl group content and protein solubility than 8% S/S and a control. Samples prepared with RBH+S/S and 2% RBH exhibited lower surface hydrophobicity than control but slightly higher than 8% S/S sample. The elastic modulus (G ') of samples prepared with RBH and S/S was higher than that of the control. After gelation was completed, the sample with RBH+S/S showed the highest G '. RBH showed a significant ability to maintain the quality of frozen fish proteins, especially when blended with S/S. This study suggests RBH can effectively protect fish myofibrillar proteins from denaturation during frozen storage and further contribute to reducing sugar/sorbitol.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available