4.6 Article

Grain growth stagnation in solid state thin films: A phase-field study

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
Volume 130, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/5.0049027

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. IIT Kanpur [IITK/MET/2014228]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Grain boundary grooving can significantly affect the grain growth in polycrystalline thin films with the possibility of grain boundary stagnation. However, in real systems, grooves can migrate along with moving grain boundaries, potentially causing stagnation if behaving like a surface-anchored notch.
Grain boundary grooving significantly affects the grain growth behavior in a polycrystalline thin film with columnar grain structure by partial or complete pinning of moving grain boundaries. Theoretically, it can be shown that the stagnation of grain growth can occur for certain combinations of grain size and film thickness, for which grain boundaries cannot escape from the groove root. However, in real systems, grooves attached with the grain boundaries can migrate along with the moving grain boundaries. The possibility for stagnation arises when a groove behaves like a notch fixed at the surface. Such a condition can arise if the surface diffusivity is sufficiently reduced after stable groove formation using surface treatment. In the present study, grain growth in a solid-state thin film is investigated using a three-dimensional phase-field method that allows grains of a solid phase to be in equilibrium with a vapor phase at a constant temperature. The model captures the essential physics of surface diffusion-controlled thermal grooving and its interaction with a moving grain boundary. From the phase-field simulations, three possible interactions between the grain boundary and the groove are identified: stagnation of grain boundary, grain boundary-groove detachment, and coupled movement of the groove and the grain boundary.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available