4.2 Article

Public Perceptions of Australian Assistance Dogs: Happier and Better Used Than Companion Dogs

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED ANIMAL WELFARE SCIENCE
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages 18-30

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10888705.2021.1931869

Keywords

Attitudes; working dogs; animal welfare; sustainability

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Australian public showed equal interest in both assistance and companion dogs, but were more supportive of the use of assistance dogs and perceived them as happier. Participants commonly endorsed the practical benefits of assistance dogs and the emotional benefits of companion dogs.
Previous studies have revealed cultural differences in perceptions of assistance dogs, but this has not been investigated in almost 20 years. This study aimed to develop an understanding of the Australian public's perceptions toward both assistance and companion dogs. A questionnaire was completed by 258 Australians asking about their interest in, attitudes towards, and perceived happiness of the two types of dogs. Results revealed participants were equally interested in them, but supportive of the use of assistance dogs, and perceived them as happier. Qualitative analysis revealed participants commonly endorsed the practical benefits of assistance dogs and the emotional benefits of companion dogs. Differences in happiness ratings can potentially be explained by the common endorsement that companion dogs are sometimes neglected while assistance dogs enjoy working and constant companionship with their handler. However, several participants expressed concern regarding the restrictive nature of the assistance work. There was an increase in concerns raised for the welfare of both dogs as compared to previous studies, suggesting a rise in concern about dog welfare and the ethics of keeping dogs for human benefits.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available