4.5 Article

Retinal Amyloid Imaging for Screening Alzheimer's Disease

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE
Volume 83, Issue 2, Pages 927-934

Publisher

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-210327

Keywords

Alzheimer's disease; amyloid; mild cognitive impairment; retina

Categories

Funding

  1. Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development [7211800049, 7211800130, 7211700121]
  2. [17H0419611]
  3. [15K0931607]
  4. [17H0975609]
  5. [17K1082709]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, retinal amyloid deposition was found to be greater in AD patients compared to normal controls, with a slight but insignificant increase in those with mild cognitive impairment. Retinal amyloid deposition was correlated with whole gray matter atrophy but not with cognitive scores or medial temporal lobe atrophy.
Background: Cost-effective and noninvasive methods for in vivo imaging of amyloid deposition are needed to screen Alzheimer's disease (AD). Although retinal amyloid is a possible diagnostic marker of AD, there are very few studies on in vivo retinal amyloid imaging. Objective: To examine the usefulness of in vivo imaging of retinal amyloid in AD patients. Methods: To examine amyloid deposition, 30 Japanese subjects (10 normal control (NC), 7 with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and 13 with AD) underwent a complete ophthalmic examination, including fundus imaging by scanning laser ophthalmoscopy before and after oral curcumin intake. Results: Retinal amyloid deposition was greater in AD than in NC subjects (*p < 0.05) while MCI showed a slight but insignificant increase of retinal amyloid deposition relative to NC subjects. Retinal amyloid deposition was correlated with whole gray matter atrophy (r = 0.51, *p < 0.05) but not with the cognitive score of the Mini-Mental State Examination, nor with medial temporal lobe atrophy. Conclusion: The present noninvasive in vivo detection of retinal amyloid deposition is useful for screening AD patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available