4.7 Article

The effect of silver nanoparticles and silver ions on mammalian and plant cells in vitro

Journal

FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY
Volume 96, Issue -, Pages 50-61

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2016.07.015

Keywords

Silver nanoparticles; Silver ions; In vitro cytotoxicity; Genotoxicity; Solanum spp.; Mammalian cell

Funding

  1. project of the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic [LO1304, LO1305]
  2. Czech Science Foundation [15-22248S, IGA_LF_2016_013]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Silver nanopartiaes (AgNPs) are the most frequently applied nanomaterials. In our experiments, we tested AgNPs (size 27 rim) manufactured by the Tollens process. Physico-chemical methods (TEM, DLS, AFM and spectrophotometry) were used for characterization and imaging of AgNPs. The effects of AgNPs and Ag+ were studied in two experimental models (plant and mammalian cells). Human keratinocytes (SVK14) and mouse fibroblasts (NIH3T3) cell lines were selected to evaluate the cytotoxicity and genotoxicity effect on mammalian cells. Higher sensitivity to AgNPs and Ag+ was observed in NIH3T3 than in SVK14 cells. AgNPs accumulated in the nucleus of NIH3T3 cells, caused DNA damage and increased the number of apoptotic and necrotic cells. Three genotypes of Solarium spp. (S. lycopersicum cv. Amateur, S. chmielewskii, S. habrochaites) were selected to test the toxicity of AgNPs and Ag+ on the plant cells. The highest values of peroxidase activity and lipid peroxidation were recorded after the treatment of S. habrochaites genotype with AgNPs. Increased ROS levels were likely the reason for observed damaged membranes in S. habrochaites. We found that the cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of AgNPs depend not only on the characteristics of nanoparticles, but also on the type of cells that are treated with AgNPs. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available