4.7 Article

Carbon coated NaLi0.2Mn0.8O2 as a superb cathode material for sodium ion batteries

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
Volume 866, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.158950

Keywords

Cathode materials; NaLi0.2Mn0.8O2; P2-type sodium-lithium-manganese oxide; Sodium ion battery

Funding

  1. Vietnam National Foundation for Science and Technology Development (NAFOSTED) [15/2020/TN]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Adding carbon to the surface of P2-type sodium-lithium-manganese oxide material improves its rate capacity and specific capacity, making the carbon-coated NLM@C material a promising cathode material for sodium-ion batteries.
P2 structure materials have been known as a promising cathode material for sodium ion battery. However, their substandard rate capability is a major obstacle for the application of sodium ion batteries to overcome. Herein, we improved the rate capacity of the P2-type sodium-lithium-manganese oxide material by a carbon additive on the material surface. The structure and morphology of pristine sodium-lithium-manganese oxide (NLM) and carbon-coated sodium-lithium-manganese oxide (NLM@C) were confirmed by X-ray diffraction (XRD), Raman spectra, thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA), scanning electron microscopy and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDS), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The electrochemical results revealed that the carbon coating improves rate capability of NLM@C material and increases its specific capacity. Specifically, the NLM@C material delivered a specific capacity of 160 mAh g(-1) at 0.1 C, ca. 33% higher than that of pristine NLM material; the NLM@C material retained a capacity of 115 mAh g(-1) at a high charged/discharged rate of 1 C. The result suggests that NLM@C material is a promising cathode material for sodium-ion battery applications. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available