4.7 Article

Enhancing stability and luminescence quantum yield of CsPbBr3 quantum dots by embedded in borosilicate glass

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
Volume 874, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.159962

Keywords

CsPbBr3 quantum dots; High temperature melting process; Highly stable; Glass matrices; Optical properties; Solid devices

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11804295]
  2. Young Top Talent Project of Yunnan Province [YNWR-QNBJ-2018-241, YNWR-QNBJ-2018-229]
  3. Joint Foundation of Provincial Science and Technology Department-Double First-class Construction of Yunnan University [2019FY003016]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study demonstrates that highly stable luminescent CsPbBr3 quantum dots can be achieved in different glass matrices via high temperature melting and melt-quench methods, by embedding the quantum dots in the glass matrix.
Halide perovskite quantum dots have attracted considerable research interest as excellent candidate for photonic and optoelectronic applications due to their unique optoelectronic properties. Stability is prerequisite and therefore is of critical importance. Here we demonstrate highly stable luminescent CsPbBr3 quantum dots (QDs) can be achieved in different glass matrices via the high temperature melting process and melt-quench method. The microstructure of CsPbBr3 QDs glass as well as their optical properties are systematically characterized by microscopic techniques and time-resolved spectroscopic techniques. We conclude the surface passivation is the key aspect for the high stability and high luminescence by embedding the quantum dots in the glass matrix. This study provides technical method to form highly stable luminescent solid devices and detailed physical understanding which is critical for the practical applications. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available