Journal
JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
Volume 296, Issue -, Pages 89-94Publisher
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.09.049
Keywords
Adaptation; Psychological; Hypertension; Pregnancy-induced; Anxiety; Depression; Stress; Pregnancy
Categories
Funding
- Coordenacao de Aperfei-coamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior-Brasil (CAPES) [001]
- Instituto Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (IFRS)
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study found distinct differences in mental health and coping strategies among pregnant women with hypertension, particularly with higher depression symptoms and worse coping strategies for those with gestational hypertension. Cluster analysis revealed two subgroups of hypertensive women, one with poorer coping strategies and more vulnerability to negative affective states, and another with better coping and greater resilience to mental health problems.
Background: Hypertensive disorders are important causes of maternal and perinatal morbidity and death. Considering the role of both physical and psychological factors in pregnancies complicated by hypertension, the aim of this study is to examine psychological factors and coping strategies in pregnancies complicated by hypertension. Methods: Cross-sectional study. A sample of 552 pregnant women, 343 with pregnancies complicated by hypertension, were assessed in terms of depression, anxiety, stress and coping. Results: The hypertensive group had higher scores of depression, stress and anxiety than the control one. Coping strategies were different between hypertensive and control groups (except for confrontive and self-reliant coping styles). When splitting up the hypertensive group into gestational hypertension, chronic hypertension and preeclampsia syndrome, differences between this new classification reached the statistical level. Our data suggests that women with preeclampsia have more symptoms of depression and worse coping strategies - they are less optimistic and more fatalistic. However, after a cluster analysis, two different subgroups of hypertensive women were found: one with worst coping strategies and more vulnerability to negative affective states and another with better coping and more resilient to mental health problems. Limitations: Data were cross-sectional. We excluded women with some comorbidities, such as a diagnosis of kidney disease, diabetes or fetal malformation. Conclusions: It is important to consider distinct profiles of pregnant women, in order to be able to better understand the peculiarities of mental health and coping during the gestation, especially in pregnancies complicated by hypertension.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available