4.7 Article

How long do mood induction procedure (MIP) primes really last? Implications for cognitive vulnerability research

Journal

JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
Volume 292, Issue -, Pages 328-336

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.05.047

Keywords

Mood induction procedure (MIP); Temporal persistence; Sad mood; depression; Cognitive vulnerability; Cognitive reactivity

Funding

  1. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC)
  2. Insight Grant from SSHRC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to evaluate the duration of sad mood induced by commonly used Mood Induction Procedures (MIP) and found that the effects were not sufficiently persistent, except for memory-related MIPs which induced the most persistent sad mood.
Background: Mood Induction Procedures (MIPs) are used widely in research on cognitive vulnerability to depression. Although empirical evidence supports certain MIPs as effective, little research has evaluated whether MIP-induced sad moods are sufficiently persistent. This study aimed to determine (1) how long an MIP-induced mood lasts according to commonly used operational definitions and (2) whether these findings vary according to the type of MIP used. Methods: Four-hundred-and-one undergraduate students were randomly assigned to one of three commonly used sad MIPs (music, memory, music+memory) or to one of three matched neutral MIPs. Mood was repeatedly measured immediately prior to and following the MIP. Results: Results did not support the widely held belief that commonly used MIPs induce a sufficient and persistent sad mood. The memory-related MIPs induced the most persistent sad mood. Based on the majority of operational definitions, however, induced mood effects did not last longer than 4 min, regardless of MIP type. Limitations: Future studies should examine additional factors that may have affected the trajectories observed in the current study (e.g., task completed in between mood measurements) and in vulnerable (e.g., past-depressed) populations. Conclusions: This study constitutes an important first step in validating the use of MIPs in cognitive vulnerability research and provides researchers with important information on future study designs. More important, the study raises doubt about the validity of various conclusions drawn from some MIP studies and calls into question the theoretical conceptualizations of depression that are based on potentially biased results and a possibly incomplete literature.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available