4.7 Article

SUM: A benchmark dataset of Semantic Urban Meshes

Journal

ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING
Volume 179, Issue -, Pages 108-120

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2021.07.008

Keywords

Texture meshes; Urban scene understanding; Mesh annotation; Semantic segmentation; Over-segmentation; Benchmark dataset

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent advancements in data acquisition technology have enabled rapid collection of 3D texture meshes, aiding in urban environment analysis and planning. Semantic segmentation through deep learning enhances understanding but demands a significant amount of labelled data. This research introduces a new benchmark dataset, semi-automatic annotation framework, and annotation tool for 3D meshes, offering potential time savings and comparative analysis for semantic segmentation methods.
Recent developments in data acquisition technology allow us to collect 3D texture meshes quickly. Those can help us understand and analyse the urban environment, and as a consequence are useful for several applications like spatial analysis and urban planning. Semantic segmentation of texture meshes through deep learning methods can enhance this understanding, but it requires a lot of labelled data. The contributions of this work are three-fold: (1) a new benchmark dataset of semantic urban meshes, (2) a novel semi-automatic annotation framework, and (3) an annotation tool for 3D meshes. In particular, our dataset covers about 4 km(2) in Helsinki (Finland), with six classes, and we estimate that we save about 600 h of labelling work using our annotation framework, which includes initial segmentation and interactive refinement. We also compare the performance of several state-of-the-art 3D semantic segmentation methods on the new benchmark dataset. Other researchers can use our results to train their networks: the dataset is publicly available, and the annotation tool is released as open-source.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available