4.5 Article

Effect of electrolyte additives on the performance of lithium-ion batteries

Journal

IONICS
Volume 27, Issue 9, Pages 3821-3827

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11581-021-04163-1

Keywords

Lithium-ion battery; Electrolyte additive; Swelling ratio; Cycling performance; Storage

Funding

  1. Major Scientific and Technological Innovation Project of Shandong [20JCYBJC00690]
  2. [2019JZZY010457]
  3. [2020CXGC010309]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the optimization of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) performance using different electrolyte additives, highlighting the importance of electrolyte additives in improving cycling and storage performance of LIBs. Results showed that each additive had a different impact on the capacity retention and swelling ratio of LIBs, emphasizing the role of electrolyte additives in enhancing LIBs performance.
The storage performance is important for lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) especially with low voltage at high temperature. We herein studied the phenomenon and mechanism of the swelling of LIBs under different storing conditions. We report a systematic optimization of the performance of LIBs using different electrolytes as additives containing 1,3,2-dioxathiolane 2,2-dioxide (DTD), vinyl ethylene carbonate (VEC), and fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC). Cycling performance and storage performance of LIBs with different electrolytes are studied. The LIB using electrolyte with DTD as additive, which exhibits the highest initial capacity and lowest resistance during cycling, has the lowest swelling ratio after 2-week storage. The LIB using electrolyte with FEC as additive has the highest capacity retention ratio during cycling. The electrolyte additive does play an important role in improving the performance of the LIBs. Single additive cannot solve all the problems of a LIB. This work is expected to provide efficient guides toward smart modulation of multi-functional rechargeable batteries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available