4.6 Review

Frailty and cerebrovascular disease: Concepts and clinical implications for stroke medicine

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages 251-259

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/17474930211034331

Keywords

Frailty; stroke; inflammageing; rehabilitation

Funding

  1. National Institute of Health Research Clinical Lectureships
  2. Dunhill Medical Trust [RTF107/0117]
  3. Joint British Association of Stroke Physicians
  4. NIHR CRN: Stroke Writing Group Award

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Frailty is a distinctive health state that compromises older people's ability to deal with acute stressors due to age-related declines in physiological reserve. Even though frailty is closely associated with age, multimorbidity, and disability, it is a separate syndrome with poorer outcomes for various medical conditions.
Frailty is a distinctive health state in which the ability of older people to cope with acute stressors is compromised by an increased vulnerability brought by age-associated declines in physiological reserve and function across multiple organ systems. Although closely associated with age, multimorbidity, and disability, frailty is a discrete syndrome that is associated with poorer outcomes across a range of medical conditions. However, its role in cerebrovascular disease and stroke has received limited attention. The estimated rise in the prevalence of frailty associated with changing demographics over the coming decades makes it an important issue for stroke practitioners, cerebrovascular research, clinical service provision, and stroke survivors alike. This review will consider the concept and models of frailty, how frailty is common in cerebrovascular disease, the impact of frailty on stroke risk factors, acute treatments, and rehabilitation, and considerations for future applications in both cerebrovascular clinical and research settings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available