4.5 Article

RENEB/EURADOS field exercise 2019: robust dose estimation under outdoor conditions based on the dicentric chromosome assay

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION BIOLOGY
Volume 97, Issue 9, Pages 1181-1198

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2021.1941380

Keywords

Dicentric chromosome; RENEB; EURADOS; inter-laboratory comparison; biological dosimetry

Funding

  1. European Radiation Dosimetry Group Working Group 10 (EURADOS WG 10)
  2. Running the European Network of Biological and retrospective Physical dosimetry (RENEB)
  3. Public Health England (PHE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The biological and physical assays for retrospective dosimetry were validated and improved through a field exercise simulating real-life exposure scenarios. Results showed consistency among participants in dicentric chromosome assay (DCA) results and good match with reference doses, with potential underestimation corrected by exposure time. Participants were able to successfully estimate doses and provide important information on exposure scenarios.
Purpose Biological and/or physical assays for retrospective dosimetry are valuable tools to recover the exposure situation and to aid medical decision making. To further validate and improve such biological and physical assays, in 2019, EURADOS Working Group 10 and RENEB performed a field exercise in Lund, Sweden, to simulate various real-life exposure scenarios. Materials and methods For the dicentric chromosome assay (DCA), blood tubes were located at anthropomorphic phantoms positioned in different geometries and were irradiated with a 1.36 TBq Ir-192-source. For each exposure condition, dose estimates were provided by at least one laboratory and for four conditions by 17 participating RENEB laboratories. Three radio-photoluminescence glass dosimeters were placed at each tube to assess reference doses. Results The DCA results were homogeneous between participants and matched well with the reference doses (>= 95% of estimates within +/- 0.5 Gy of the reference). For samples close to the source systematic underestimation could be corrected by accounting for exposure time. Heterogeneity within and between tubes was detected for reference doses as well as for DCA doses estimates. Conclusions The participants were able to successfully estimate the doses and to provide important information on the exposure scenarios under conditions closely resembling a real-life situation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available