Journal
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSELS AND PIPING
Volume 191, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2021.104329
Keywords
Defect assessment; Pipelines; Failure pressure prediction; Finite element modeling; Mechano-electrochemical interaction
Funding
- China Scholarship Council (CSC) [201908510201]
- NSERC
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Research on defect assessment for pipelines has significantly advanced in the past decades, with the introduction of finite element analysis and multi-physics field coupling models. However, the use of Level 3 methods is limited by the requirement for strong academic background knowledge, and efforts should be made to develop a user-friendly platform for industry application in the future. Paying particular attention to defect assessment on pipeline welds is necessary for future work.
Defect assessment is critical to fitness-for-service determination and failure pressure prediction for pipelines. This work develops a comprehensive review of the principles, numerical solutions, and applications of Levels 1, 2 and 3 defect assessment methods developed in the past four decades. Commentary remarks were given on each method regarding the potential problems and suggested improvements. Pipeline defect assessment has evolved in significant developments of modelling method, geometrical definition, computational solutions and predictive accuracy and reliability. Specifically, the introduction of finite element analysis in Level 3 assessment method enables modelling of defects with a more complex geometry. The integration of a mechano-electrochemical interaction at corrosion defect results in development of multi-physics field coupling models, making the defect assessment and pipeline failure prediction at a more mechanistic and accurate level. New criteria are proposed to identify interaction rules for adjacent corrosion defects to further improve the modelling accuracy. Nowadays, Levels 1 and 2 defect assessment methods have been commonly used in industry. However, the use of Level-3 method requires sound background knowledge in multiple academic majors, limiting its use in practice. Further efforts should be made to develop a convenient operating platform for industry to directly use Level-3 defect assessment. Moreover, defect assessment on pipeline welds should be paid particular attention in the future work.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available