4.4 Article

Validation of a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for the simultaneous determination of sulfonamides, trimethoprim and dapsone in muscle, egg, milk and honey

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/19440049.2016.1152569

Keywords

Sulfonamides; trimethoprim; dapsone; validation; various matrices; liquid chromatography mass spectrometry

Funding

  1. Croatian Veterinary Institute

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A quantitative multi-residue method that includes 13 sulfonamides, trimethoprim and dapsone was developed and validated according to Commission Decision 2002/657/EC for muscle, milk egg and honey samples. For all matrices, the same extraction procedure was used. Samples were extracted with an acetone/dichloromethane mixture and cleaned up on aromatic sulfonic acid (SO3H) SPE cartridges. After elution and concentration steps, analytes were identified and quantified by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Data were acquired according to the multiple reaction-monitoring approach (MRM) and analytes were quantified both by the isotope dilution and the matrix-matched approaches calculating the response factors for the scanned product ions. The developed method shows good linearity, specificity, precision (repeatability and within-laboratory reproducibility), and trueness. Estimated CC beta for sulfonamides ranged between 5.6 and 8.2 mu g kg(-1) for eggs, between 11.1 and 69.9 mu g kg(-1) for milk, between 64.7 and 87.9 mu g kg(-1) for muscle, and between 2.7 and 5.3 mu g kg(-1) for honey. CC beta values for dapsone were 3.1, 0.6, 0.7 and 1.5 mu g kg(-1) and for trimethoprim were 3.1, 6.7, 81.7 and 3.0 mu g kg(-1) calculated for eggs, milk, muscle and honey, respectively. Recovery for all matrices was in the range from 89.1% and 109.7%. In matrix effect testing, no significant deviations were found between different samples of muscle and milk; however, a matrix effect was observed when testing different types of honey. The validation results demonstrate that the method is suitable for routine veterinary drug analysis and confirmation of suspect samples.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available