4.7 Review

Pathogenic Mechanisms of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy beyond Sarcomere Dysfunction

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms22168933

Keywords

hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; pathological cardiac hypertrophy; sarcomere; cardiac myocyte; cardiac fibroblast; cardiac fibrosis; myocyte-fibroblast interaction; extracellular matrix

Funding

  1. American Heart Association Innovative Project Award [18IPA34170294]
  2. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health [UL1TR002544]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a common inherited cardiovascular disorder with complex pathogenesis involving factors beyond sarcomere mutations. Research challenges the monogenic origin of HCM and emphasizes the importance of re-evaluating disease mechanisms.
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most common inherited cardiovascular disorder, affecting 1 in 500 people in the general population. Although characterized by asymmetric left ventricular hypertrophy, cardiomyocyte disarray, and cardiac fibrosis, HCM is in fact a highly complex disease with heterogenous clinical presentation, onset, and complications. While HCM is generally accepted as a disease of the sarcomere, variable penetrance in families with identical genetic mutations challenges the monogenic origin of HCM and instead implies a multifactorial cause. Furthermore, large-scale genome sequencing studies revealed that many genes previously reported as causative of HCM in fact have little or no evidence of disease association. These findings thus call for a re-evaluation of the sarcomere-centered view of HCM pathogenesis. Here, we summarize our current understanding of sarcomere-independent mechanisms of cardiomyocyte hypertrophy, highlight the role of extracellular signals in cardiac fibrosis, and propose an alternative but integrated model of HCM pathogenesis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available