4.7 Review

Nanoparticles Functionalised with Re(I) Tricarbonyl Complexes for Cancer Theranostics

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms22126546

Keywords

cancer; nanoparticles; iron oxide; rhenium(I) tricarbonyl; nanotheranostic

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation [113629, 117984]
  2. Tshwane University of Technology, Pretoria, South Africa

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The application of magnetic nanomedicine as a new tool in cancer treatment research has gained significant attention. MNPs possess unique characteristics, making them suitable for cancer diagnosis and therapy.
Globally, cancer is the second (to cardiovascular diseases) leading cause of death. Regardless of various efforts (i.e., finance, research, and workforce) to advance novel cancer theranostics (diagnosis and therapy), there have been few successful attempts towards ongoing clinical treatment options as a result of the complications posed by cancerous tumors. In recent years, the application of magnetic nanomedicine as theranostic devices has garnered enormous attention in cancer treatment research. Magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) are capable of tuning the magnetic field in their environment, which positively impacts theranostic applications in nanomedicine significantly. MNPs are utilized as contrasting agents for cancer diagnosis, molecular imaging, hyperfusion region visualization, and T cell-based radiotherapy because of their interesting features of small size, high reactive surface area, target ability to cells, and functionalization capability. Radiolabelling of NPs is a powerful diagnostic approach in nuclear medicine imaging and therapy. The use of luminescent radioactive rhenium(I), Re-188/186, tricarbonyl complexes functionalised with magnetite Fe3O4 NPs in nanomedicine has improved the diagnosis and therapy of cancer tumors. This is because the combination of Re(I) with MNPs can improve low distribution and cell penetration into deeper tissues.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available