4.7 Review

The Role of Microglia in Modulating Neuroinflammation after Spinal Cord Injury

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms22189706

Keywords

spinal cord injury; microglia; neuroinflammation

Funding

  1. Halbert Chair in Neural Repair and Regeneration
  2. DeZwirek Family Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Neuroinflammation plays a crucial role in the development of spinal cord injury, with microglia being key players in modulating the inflammatory response. Microglia interact with different cell types to facilitate injury response, but further research is needed to fully understand their mechanisms of action and spatial and temporal profiles.
The pathobiology of traumatic and nontraumatic spinal cord injury (SCI), including degenerative myelopathy, is influenced by neuroinflammation. The neuroinflammatory response is initiated by a multitude of injury signals emanating from necrotic and apoptotic cells at the lesion site, recruiting local and infiltrating immune cells that modulate inflammatory cascades to aid in the protection of the lesion site and encourage regenerative processes. While peripheral immune cells are involved, microglia, the resident immune cells of the central nervous system (CNS), are known to play a central role in modulating this response. Microglia are armed with numerous cell surface receptors that interact with neurons, astrocytes, infiltrating monocytes, and endothelial cells to facilitate a dynamic, multi-faceted injury response. While their origin and essential nature are understood, their mechanisms of action and spatial and temporal profiles warrant extensive additional research. In this review, we describe the role of microglia and the cellular network in SCI, discuss tools for their investigation, outline their spatiotemporal profile, and propose translationally-relevant therapeutic targets to modulate neuroinflammation in the setting of SCI.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available