4.7 Review

Renal and Red Marrow Dosimetry in Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy: 20 Years of History and Ahead

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms22158326

Keywords

somatostatin; PRRT; dosimetry; DOTATOC; DOTATATE

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review discusses the development of dosimetry and PRRT studies over the past two decades, focusing on differences in toxicity between Y-90, Lu-177, and EBRT, as well as evaluating the imaging modalities' ability to assess dosimetry to target tissues. The importance of individualized activity injection and challenging current marrow dosimetry methods are highlighted, with a proposed tandem therapy optimizing the toxicity-response pattern of Lu-177-DOTATATE and Y-90-DOTATOC.
The development of dosimetry and studies in peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) over the past two decades are reviewed. Differences in kidney and bone marrow toxicity reported between Y-90, Lu-177 and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) are discussed with regard to the physical properties of these beta emitter radionuclides. The impact of these properties on the response to small and large tumors is also considered. Capacities of the imaging modalities to assess the dosimetry to target tissues are evaluated. Studies published in the past two years that confirm a red marrow uptake in Lu-177-DOTATATE therapy, as already observed 20 years ago in Y-86-DOTATOC PET studies, are analyzed in light of the recent developments in the transferrin transport mechanism. The review enlightens the importance (i) of using state-of-the-art imaging modalities, (ii) of individualizing the activity to be injected with regard to the huge tissue uptake variability observed between patients, (iii) of challenging the currently used but inappropriate blood-based red marrow dosimetry and (iv) of considering individual tandem therapy. Last, a smart individually optimized tandem therapy taking benefit of the bi-orthogonal toxicity-response pattern of Lu-177-DOTATATE and of Y-90-DOTATOC is proposed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available