4.7 Article

Extracellular Matrix Deposition and Remodeling after Corneal Alkali Burn in Mice

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms22115708

Keywords

glycosaminoglycans; proteoglycans; corneal stroma; scar formation; corneal wounding

Funding

  1. National Eye Institute of the National Institutes of Health [R01EY029289, P30 EY07551]
  2. Lions Foundation
  3. Mizutani Foundation
  4. University of Houston

Ask authors/readers for more resources

After a corneal chemical injury, there were significant changes in the distribution of PGs, with an overall increase in CS and an increase in KS expression at a certain period, indicating the crucial roles of PGs and GAGs in maintaining corneal transparency.
Corneal transparency relies on the precise arrangement and orientation of collagen fibrils, made of mostly Type I and V collagen fibrils and proteoglycans (PGs). PGs are essential for correct collagen fibrillogenesis and maintaining corneal homeostasis. We investigated the spatial and temporal distribution of glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) and PGs after a chemical injury. The chemical composition of chondroitin sulfate (CS)/dermatan sulfate (DS) and heparan sulfate (HS) were characterized in mouse corneas 5 and 14 days after alkali burn (AB), and compared to uninjured corneas. The expression profile and corneal distribution of CS/DSPGs and keratan sulfate (KS) PGs were also analyzed. We found a significant overall increase in CS after AB, with an increase in sulfated forms of CS and a decrease in lesser sulfated forms of CS. Expression of the CSPGs biglycan and versican was increased after AB, while decorin expression was decreased. We also found an increase in KS expression 14 days after AB, with an increase in lumican and mimecan expression, and a decrease in keratocan expression. No significant changes in HS composition were noted after AB. Taken together, our study reveals significant changes in the composition of the extracellular matrix following a corneal chemical injury.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available