4.7 Article

BRAF Inhibitors Induce Feedback Activation of RAS Pathway in Thyroid Cancer Cells

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms22115744

Keywords

thyroid cancer cell; BRAF(V600E); BRAF inhibitors; cell signaling

Funding

  1. Ministero della Salute [RF-2013-02354985]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study demonstrates that the BRAF inhibitors Vemurafenib and Dabrafenib induce antiproliferative and redifferentiative effects in thyroid cancer cells, while rewiring the MAPK pathway related to RAS signaling.
BRAF(V600E) is the most frequent oncogenic mutation identified in papillary thyroid cancer (PTC). In PTC patients who do not respond to standard treatment, BRAF inhibitors are currently tested as alternative strategies. However, as observed for other targeted therapies, patients eventually develop drug resistance. The mechanisms of BRAF inhibitors response are still poorly understood in a thyroid cancer (TC) context. In this study, we investigated in BRAF(V600E) mutated TC cell lines the effects of Vemurafenib and Dabrafenib, two BRAF inhibitors currently used in a clinical setting. We assessed cell proliferation, and the expression and activity of the thyroid function related transporter NIS following the treatment with BRAF inhibitors. In addition, we investigated the global gene expression by microarray, the relevant modulated biological processes by gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA), and TC specific gene signatures related to MAPK pathway activation, thyroid differentiation, and transcriptional profile associated with BRAF(V600E) or RAS mutation. We found that both inhibitors induce antiproliferative and redifferentiative effects on TC cells, as well as a rewiring of the MAPK pathway related to RAS signaling. Our results suggest a possible mechanism of drug response to the BRAF inhibitors Vemurafenib or Dabrafenib, supporting very recent findings in TC patients treated with targeted therapies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available