4.7 Article

Phenolic Profiles of Red Wine Relate to Vascular Endothelial Benefits Mediated by SIRT1 and SIRT6

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms22115677

Keywords

red wines; polyphenols; antioxidant; insulin resistance; hyperglycemia; sirtuins

Funding

  1. University of Campania L. Vanvitelli [PON I&C 2014-2020-CAPSULE-F/200016/01-03/X45]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that Magliocco red wine is rich in monomeric anthocyanins, catechins, and low molecular weight phenolic compounds, showing high antioxidant capacity and anti-inflammatory effects. In vitro experiments also demonstrated that Magliocco can decrease reactive oxygen species and cytokine release, while upregulating SIRT1 and SIRT6 levels.
Dietary phenolic compounds possess potent bioactivity against inflammatory pathways of chronic inflammatory conditions, such as type 2 diabetes. Here, the phenolic profile and bioactivity of Italian red wines Gaglioppo, Magliocco, and Nerello Mascalese were characterized. NMR, HPLC/UV-Vis and spectrophotometric characterization showed that Magliocco was the richest wine in monomeric anthocyanins (two-fold), catechins, and low molecular weight phenolics (LMWP). A positive correlation was observed between the polyphenolic content and antioxidant capacity (p < 0.05), with Magliocco displaying the highest antioxidant capacity (p < 0.01). In vitro evidence on the endothelial cell models of insulin resistance and hyperglycemia showed the ability of Magliocco to reduce reactive oxygen species (ROS) (p < 0.01) and cytokine release (p < 0.01) and to upregulate SIRT1 and SIRT6 (p < 0.01). On the whole, the results indicated that the quantitative and qualitative phenolic profiles of red wines influence their in vitro beneficial effects on oxidative and proinflammatory milieu in endothelial cells, showing a positive modulation of SIRT1 and SIRT6, both implied in vascular aging.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available