4.7 Review

X Chromosome Inactivation in Carriers of Fabry Disease: Review and Meta-Analysis

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms22147663

Keywords

Fabry disease; carriers; X chromosome inactivation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Anderson-Fabry disease is an X-linked genetic disorder with higher incidence in affected males, but also poses risks for female carriers. The clinical symptoms of the disease are diverse, and studies suggest a correlation between skewed X chromosome inactivation and symptoms in carriers.
Anderson-Fabry disease is an X-linked inborn error of glycosphingolipid catabolism caused by a deficiency of alpha-galactosidase A. The incidence ranges between 1: 40,000 and 1:117,000 of live male births. In Italy, an estimate of incidence is available only for the north-western Italy, where it is of approximately 1:4000. Clinical symptoms include angiokeratomas, corneal dystrophy, and neurological, cardiac and kidney involvement. The prevalence of symptomatic female carriers is about 70%, and in some cases, they can exhibit a severe phenotype. Previous studies suggest a correlation between skewed X chromosome inactivation and symptoms in carriers of X-linked disease, including Fabry disease. In this review, we briefly summarize the disease, focusing on the clinical symptoms of carriers and analysis of the studies so far published in regards to X chromosome inactivation pattern, and manifesting Fabry carriers. Out of 151 records identified, only five reported the correlation between the analysis of XCI in leukocytes and the related phenotype in Fabry carriers, in particular evaluating the Mainz Severity Score Index or cardiac involvement. The meta-analysis did not show any correlation between MSSI or cardiac involvement and skewed XCI, likely because the analysis of XCI in leukocytes is not useful for predicting the phenotype in Fabry carriers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available