4.5 Article

Instrument localisation for endovascular aneurysm repair: Comparison of two methods based on tracking systems or using imaging

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/rcs.2327

Keywords

2D; 3D registration; 3D localisation; computer-assisted surgery; electromagnetic tracking system; endovascular procedures; fibre optical shape sensing

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministerium fur Wirtschaft, Verkehr, Arbeit, Technologie und Tourismus, SchleswigHolstein
  2. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung [13GW0228]
  3. Projekt DEAL

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two novel approaches for obtaining three-dimensional instrument positions are introduced in this study – one tracking based and one image processing based. The tracking based method shows promising results for usage in EVAR procedures, while the image-based approach is more suitable for applications in smaller vessels.
Background In endovascular aneuysm repair (EVAR) procedures, medical instruments are currently navigated with a two-dimensional imaging based guidance requiring X-rays and contrast agent. Methods Novel approaches for obtaining the three-dimensional instrument positions are introduced. Firstly, a method based on fibre optical shape sensing, one electromagnetic sensor and a preoperative computed tomography (CT) scan is described. Secondly, an approach based on image processing using one 2D fluoroscopic image and a preoperative CT scan is introduced. Results For the tracking based method, average errors from 1.81 to 3.13 mm and maximum errors from 3.21 to 5.46 mm were measured. For the image-based approach, average errors from 3.07 to 6.02 mm and maximum errors from 8.05 to 15.75 mm were measured. Conclusion The tracking based method is promising for usage in EVAR procedures. For the image-based approach are applications in smaller vessels more suitable, since its errors increase with the vessel diameter.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available