4.7 Review

Preventing sepsis; how can artificial intelligence inform the clinical decision-making process? A systematic review

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104457

Keywords

Sepsis; Prediction; Machine learning; Decision-making; Artificial intelligence

Funding

  1. Newcastle University, UK

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This systematic review identified 194 predictors used to train machine learning algorithms for sepsis prediction, with common predictors including age, gender, smoking, and various health indicators. All included studies used artificial intelligence techniques, with an average sensitivity of 75.7 +/- 17.88 and average specificity of 63.08 +/- 22.01.
Background and objectives: Sepsis is a life-threatening condition that is associated with increased mortality. Artificial intelligence tools can inform clinical decision making by flagging patients at risk of developing infection and subsequent sepsis. This systematic review aims to identify the optimal set of predictors used to train machine learning algorithms to predict the likelihood of an infection and subsequent sepsis. Methods: This systematic review was registered in PROSPERO database (CRD42020158685). We conducted a systematic literature review across 3 large databases: Medline, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Embase. Quantitative primary research studies that focused on sepsis prediction associated with bacterial infection in adults in all care settings were eligible for inclusion. Results: Seventeen articles met our inclusion criteria. We identified 194 predictors that were used to train machine learning algorithms, with 13 predictors used on average across all included studies. The most prevalent predictors included age, gender, smoking, alcohol intake, heart rate, blood pressure, lactate level, cardiovascular disease, endocrine disease, cancer, chronic kidney disease (eGFR<60 mL/min), white blood cell count, liver dysfunction, surgical approach (open or minimally invasive), and pre-operative haematocrit < 30 %. All included studies used artificial intelligence techniques, with average sensitivity 75.7 +/- 17.88, and average specificity 63.08 +/- 22.01. Conclusion: The type of predictors influenced the predictive power and predictive timeframe of the developed machine learning algorithm. Predicting the likelihood of sepsis through artificial intelligence can help concentrate finite resources to those patients who are most at risk. Future studies should focus on developing more sensitive and specific algorithms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available