4.5 Article

Thermodynamics of the alanine aminotransferase reaction

Journal

FLUID PHASE EQUILIBRIA
Volume 422, Issue -, Pages 87-98

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.fluid.2016.01.023

Keywords

Equilibrium constant; Activity coefficient; Reaction equilibrium; Yield; ePC-SAFT; Biothermodynamics

Funding

  1. German Science Foundation
  2. Cluster of Excellence RESOLV - Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [EXC 1069]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The thermodynamic equilibrium of the aminotransferase reaction from L-alanine and 2-oxoglutarate to L-glutamate and pyruvate in aqueous solution was investigated in a temperature range between 25 and 37 degrees C and pH between at 5 and 9. Prior to considering the reaction equilibria, measurements were carried out to ensure the enzyme activity in the aqueous reaction media. After that, equilibrium concentrations of reacting agents were measured by HPLC-analysis. At constant temperature and pH, reaction equilibrium was shown to depend on the absolute molalities (0.005-0130 mol kg(-1)) as well as on the ratio of initial molalities of the reactants. It could be concluded that reaction equilibrium was shifted towards the product site upon increasing reactant molalities, increasing temperature, and increasing pH. Further, yields of pyruvate were increased upon excess initial molality of L-alanine compared to 2-oxoglutarate. The thermodynamic equilibrium constant K-a center dot was determined by extrapolating the ratio of product equilibrium molalites and reactant equilibrium molalites to infinite dilution of all reacting agents. The activity-coefficient ratio of products and reactants in the reaction media was predicted with ePC-SAFT. Combining K-a center dot and the activity-coefficient ratio allowed quantitatively predicting the influence of temperature, pH, and reacting-agent molalities on the reaction equilibrium. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available