4.7 Article

A Novel Lame Mode RF-MEMS resonator with high quality factor

Journal

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.106484

Keywords

Bias voltage; Fabrication methodology; Lame mode; Loss mechanisms; Quality factor; MEMS resonator

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFF01010300]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61874116, 61734007, 61804150]
  3. Youth Innovation Promotion Association of CAS [29E07RQC03]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work introduces a high-performance Lame mode resonator with optimized design to decrease anchor loss and thermoelastic damping, and developed a simple and reliable process for batch fabrication. Impressive performance was achieved in both air and vacuum, and nonlinearities were observed experimentally, providing useful guidance for stable operation.
A B S T R A C T This work presents a high-performance Lame mode resonator with high Q values. The anchor loss and thermoelastic damping (TED) were effectively decreased with the optimized tether design and etch hole distribution. A simple and reliable process was developed to batch fabricate the Lame mode resonators with nano-scale spacing gap. In air, a low bias voltage of 2.5 V can excite a resonance peak height over 26 dB for the resonator with high Q of 8900. In vacuum, the required bias voltage was further down to 1.5 V, which is the lowest one among the reported Lame mode resonators. A boosted Q value of 128400 was obtained, corresponding to the highest f x Q product of 6.60 x 10 12 among the state-of-art perforated ones. Moreover, the nonlinearities were experimentally observed, which provides helpful guidance on the stable operation of the resonators. The proposed resonator could have potential in building up advanced wireless communication systems with low power consumption and high-level integration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available