4.7 Article

Aerosolized plus intravenous colistin vs intravenous colistin alone for the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia due to multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria: A retrospective cohort study

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 108, Issue -, Pages 406-412

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.06.007

Keywords

Aerosolized; Colistin; Multi-drug-resistant; Pneumonia

Funding

  1. King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia [RSP2021/74]
  2. Deanship of Scientific Research at Umm Al-Qura University [19-MED-1-02-00 03]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared the effectiveness and safety of aerosolized plus intravenous colistin with intravenous colistin alone in treating nosocomial pneumonia caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. The results showed that the combination of aerosolized and intravenous colistin achieved higher rates of clinical cure and microbiological eradication compared to intravenous colistin alone.
Objective: To compare the effectiveness and safety of aerosolized (AER) plus intravenous (IV) colistin with IV colistin alone in patients with nosocomial pneumonia (NP) due to multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gramnegative bacteria. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of adults with NP who received IV colistin alone or in combination with AER colistin. The primary endpoint was clinical cure at end of therapy. Secondary endpoints included microbiological eradication, in-hospital mortality and nephrotoxicity. Results: In total, 135 patients were included in this study: 65 patients received AER plus IV colistin and 70 patients received IV colistin alone. Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. Clinical cure was achieved in 42 (65%) patients who received AER plus IV colistin and 26 (37%) patients who received IV colistin alone (P = 0.01). Among a total of 88 patients who were microbiologically evaluable, 27 (42%) patients who received AER plus IV colistin and 12 (17%) patients who received IV colistin alone attained favourable microbiological outcomes (P = 0.022). In-hospital mortality (43% vs 59%, P = 0.072) was higher in patients who received IV colistin alone, but the difference was not significant. Renal injury occurred in 31% of patients who received AER plus IV colistin and in 41% of patients who received IV colistin alone (P = 0.198). Conclusion: AER colistin can be considered as salvage therapy as an adjunct to IV administration for the treatment of patients with NP due to MDR Gram-negative pathogens. (c) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available