4.7 Article

Electrochemical performance and distribution of relaxation times analysis of tungsten stabilized La0•5Sr0•5Fe0•9W0•1O3-d electrode for symmetric solid oxide fuel cells

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 46, Issue 58, Pages 30101-30111

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.06.140

Keywords

Solid oxide fuel cells; Symmetric electrode; Ferrite; Distribution of relaxation times

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51872067, 21773048]
  2. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFB1502200]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

LSFW electrode shows good phase and structural stability under different atmospheres, low polarization resistance, and excellent performance at 800 degrees Celsius, indicating promising applications in solid oxide fuel cells.
W-doped La0.5Sr0.5Fe0.9W0.1O3- d (LSFW) was prepared and evaluated as a symmetric electrode for solid oxide fuel cells (SSOFCs). Phase and structural stability of LSFW under both reducing and oxidizing atmospheres was studied. The oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) and hydrogen oxidation reaction (HOR) mechanisms were investigated by using electrochemical impedance spectra (EIS) and distribution of relaxation times (DRT). Electrode polarization resistance (Rp) of LSFW are 0.08 and 0.16 U cm2 in air and wet hydrogen at 800 degrees C, respectively. DRT results indicate that the rate-limiting step of LSFW at 800 degrees C in cathodic conditions and anodic conditions are related to oxygen diffusion and hydrogen adsorption/diffusion, respectively. A La0.8Sr0.2Ga0.8Mg0.2O3- d (LSGM) electrolyte-supported single cell using LSFW electrodes shows a maximum power density of 617.3 mW cm(-2) at 800 degrees C with considerable stability and reversibility, which enables LSFW a promising SOFCs symmetric electrode material. (c) 2021 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available