4.7 Article

Low carbon ultrasonic production of alternate fuel: Operational and mechanistic concerns of the sonochemical process of hydrogen generation under various scenarios

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 46, Issue 53, Pages 26770-26787

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.05.191

Keywords

Hydrogen; Sonochemistry; Saturating gas; Acoustic pressure; Acoustic frequency; Metrics

Funding

  1. Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University [RG1441501]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the potential of sonochemistry for hydrogen production, finding that argon is the most suitable saturating gas. Optimal H-2 molar yield ratio occurs at 210 kHz under a specific acoustic intensity, while the highest hydrogen yield ratio is observed at 20 kHz under a specific net electric power.
Sonochemistry is considered as one of the cleaner pathways for hydrogen production. The present paper investigates the potential of this technique based upon mass, mass to energy and energy conversion metrics, using modelling and experimental approaches. Four scenarios are examined assuming four saturating gases, namely O-2, air, N-2 and Ar, four acoustic frequencies, i.e., 20, 210, 326 and 488 kHz, and considering common acoustic intensities then common net electric power. The study revealed that Ar is the best fitting saturating gas for the sonochemical production of hydrogen. With a common acoustic intensity of 0.48 W/cm(2), an optimum ratio of H-2 molar yield to acoustic energy intensity is retrieved at 210 kHz, while with a common net electric power of 87 W, the highest ratio of hydrogen yield to electric energy was observed at 20 kHz. Results were interpreted based upon emitter surface, energy conversion and distinction of calorimetric and cavitational energies. (C) 2021 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available