4.7 Article

Environmental and energy life cycle analyses of passenger vehicle systems using fossil fuel-derived hydrogen

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 46, Issue 73, Pages 36569-36580

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.08.135

Keywords

Hydrogen energy system; Life cycle analysis; Input-output tables; Fuel cell vehicles; Gray hydrogen; Greenhouse gas emissions

Funding

  1. Toyota Mobility Foundation [2018-10]
  2. JSPS KAKENHI [18K18230]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [18K18230] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study analyzes and compares the energy consumption and GHG emissions of hydrogen and gasoline energy systems over their entire life cycle, finding that hydrogen energy system performs better. The development of hydrogen energy may have positive impacts on future energy systems.
Hydrogen energy utilization is expected due to its environmental and energy efficiencies. However, many issues remain to be solved in the social implementation of hydrogen energy through water electrolysis. This analyzes and compares the energy consumption and GHG emissions of fossil fuel-derived hydrogen and gasoline energy systems over their entire life cycle. The results demonstrate that for similar vehicle weights, the hydrogen energy system consumes 1.8 MJ/km less energy and emits 0.15 kg-CO 2 eq./km fewer GHG emissions than those of the gasoline energy system. Hydrogen derived from fossil fuels may contribute to future energy systems due to its stable energy supply and economic efficiency. Lowering the power source carbon content also improved the environmental and energy efficiencies of hydrogen energy derived from fossil fuels. (c) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available