4.7 Article

Ambient electrosynthesis of NH3 from N2 using Bi-doped cube as electrocatalyst

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 46, Issue 62, Pages 31523-31532

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.07.039

Keywords

Nitrogen reduction reaction (NRR); Bi-doped CeO2; Selective surface; Nanocubes; First principle calculations

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51972183]
  2. Startup Funding for Talents at University of South China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The synthesis of ammonia through electrochemical nitrogen reduction reaction (NRR) shows promising potential, with Bi-doped CeO2 nanocubes exhibiting higher activity and efficiency compared to traditional CeO2 nanoparticles.Bi doping and cube morphology are critical for enhanced NRR performance, as demonstrated by detailed analysis and first-principle calculations.
The synthesis of ammonia (NH3) from electrochemical nitrogen reduction reaction (NRR) under environmental conditions is a promising technology. Compared with the traditional artificial nitrogen fixation process by the Haber-Bosch process, electrochemical nitrogen reduction reaction (NRR) requires no harsh reaction conditions. In this work, we report that Bi-doped CeO2 nanocubes show high NRR activity as electrocatalysts. The NH3 yield of 17.83 mu gh(-1) mg(cat)(-1). and the Faradaic Efficiency (FE) of 1.61% at -0.9 V are achieved in 0.1 M Na2SO4. The performance is much higher than that for the traditional CeO2 nanoparticles. The detailed analysis indicates that both the Bi doping and the cube morphology are critical for this encouraging NRR performance. The mechanism for improving NRR is further explored with first-principle calculations, demonstrating the importance of Bi-doping for performance enhancement. (C) 2021 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available