4.5 Article

An extensive numerical benchmark of the various magnetohydrodynamic flows

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2021.108800

Keywords

MHD; Magnetic field; Lorentz force; OpenFOAM; Numerical benchmark

Funding

  1. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program TOMOCON (Smart Tomographic Sensors for Advanced Industrial Process Control) [764902]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study conducted extensive numerical simulations on various aspects of magnetohydrodynamics (MHD), achieving good agreement with available analytical solutions and other numerical results. The presented numerical benchmarks are expected to be valuable for developers of numerical codes used to simulate complex MHD phenomena.
There is a continuous need for an updated series of numerical benchmarks dealing with various aspects of the magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) phenomena (i.e. interactions of the flow of an electrically conducting fluid and an externally imposed magnetic field). The focus of the present study is numerical magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) where we have performed an extensive series of simulations for generic configurations, including: (i) a laminar conjugate MHD flow in a duct with varied electrical conductivity of the walls, (ii) a back-step flow, (iii) a multiphase cavity flow, (iv) a rising bubble in liquid metal and (v) a turbulent conjugate MHD flow in a duct with varied electrical conductivity of surrounding walls. All considered benchmark situations are for the one-way coupled MHD approach, where the induced magnetic field is negligible. The governing equations describing the one-way coupled MHD phenomena are numerically implemented in the open-source code OpenFOAM. The novel elements of the numerical algorithm include fully-conservative forms of the discretized Lorentz force in the momentum equation and divergence-free current density, the conjugate MHD (coupling of the wall/fluid domains), the multi-phase MHD, and, finally, the MHD turbulence. The multi-phase phenomena are simulated with the Volume of Fluid (VOF) approach, whereas the MHD turbulence is simulated with the dynamic Large-Eddy Simulation (LES) method. For all considered benchmark cases, a very good agreement is obtained with available analytical solutions and other numerical results in the literature. The presented extensive numerical benchmarks are expected to be potentially useful for developers of the numerical codes used to simulate various types of the complex MHD phenomena.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available