4.3 Article

A novel CuWO4-PMMA nanocomposite thin film as trouble-free and handpicking recoverable photocatalyst

Journal

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/03067319.2021.1951259

Keywords

CPTF; ciprofloxacin; methylene blue; photodegradation; visible light

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a CuWO(4)poly(methyl methacrylate) nanocomposite thin film (CPTF) was successfully fabricated using a simple and inexpensive solution casting method. The CPTF exhibited excellent photocatalytic degradation performance, which was mainly attributed to the synergistic effect between CuWO4 and PMMA.
In the present work, the CuWO(4)poly(methyl methacrylate) nanocomposite thin film (CPTF) was effectively fabricated by an effortless, simple and cheap solution casting method and it was confirmed by various analytical techniques. The crystalline size was calculated by the Debye-Sherrer method and the average particle size of pure CuWO4 and CPTF was found to be 44 nm and 40 nm, respectively. The morphology structure of CPTF nanocomposite was revealed by SEM and TEM analysis and the structure is a cubic and spherical shape with a different magnification of the surface of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) matrix, the average particle size is about 40-50 nm. XPS spectroscopy results confirmed the presence of C 1s, W 4 f, O 1s and Cu 2p components in CPTF nanocomposite. The CPTF was utilised as photocatalytic material for the degradation of ciprofloxacin (CF) and methylene blue (MB) under visible light irradiation within 90 and 70 min, respectively. The higher photocatalytic degradation is mainly due to the synergistic effect between CuWO4 and PMMA, which decrease the charge carrier (electron-hole) recombination rate. Superoxide and hydroxyl radicals played a major in the reaction which was confirmed in radical trapping experiments. This CPTF photocatalyst gives a new beginning for further research studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available