4.3 Article

Probabilistic health risk assessment and concentration of trace elements in meat, egg, and milk of Iran

Journal

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/03067319.2021.1963719

Keywords

Trace elements; ICP-OES; milk; egg; meat; health risk assessment

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This research assessed the concentration and health risk of eight trace elements in animal product samples in Markazi province of Iran. Some samples had levels of trace elements that exceeded the limits. The health risk assessment indicated that the exposed population in Markazi province was generally safe, except for children exposed to mercury in milk.
This research was performed to assess the concentration and health risk of eight trace elements (manganese (Mn), mercury (Hg), copper (Cu), lead (Pb), iron (Fe), zinc (Zn), cadmium (Cd), and arsenic (As)) in animal product samples (n = 120) in Markazi province of Iran by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES). Some trace elements such as Mn, Hg, Cu, Pb, Fe, and Zn were detected in samples while Cd and As non-detected. Fe had the highest mean level of trace elements in meat samples (1551.28 +/- 83.25 mu g/kg). The levels of Pb and Hg in some samples were upper than the limit of the European Commission (EC) and the Institute of Standards and Industrial Research of Iran (ISIRI), International/National Standards for Heavy Metals, and U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Deterministic and probabilistic health risk assessment approaches to evaluate of the target hazard quotients (THQ) and carcinogenic risks (CR) index were applied. The Monte Carlo probability distributions revealed that the rank order of total target hazard quotient (TTHQ) was milk > meat > egg. The non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic index of toxic elements indicated that exposed population in Markazi province was safe (1> THQ, 10(-4)> CR), except Hg exposure for children in milk.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available