4.5 Article

Performance of ammonia fuel in a spark assisted compression Ignition engine

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINE RESEARCH
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages 781-792

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/14680874211038726

Keywords

Ammonia fuel; internal combustion engine; operating conditions; pollutant emissions; spark

Funding

  1. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [862482]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent studies have demonstrated the feasibility of using ammonia in SI engines with an ignition booster. This study focuses on the performance and exhaust pollutants of premixed ammonia/air combustion in a Spark-Assisted Compression Ignition engine. The results show that neat ammonia can be used over a large operating range, driven by intake pressure and a classical ignition device with a high compression ratio.
Recent studies concluded that the use of ammonia in SI engines is possible thanks to an ignition booster or promoter. In this paper, the improvement of premixed ammonia/air combustion for internal combustion engines is studied as a function of performance and exhaust pollutants in a Spark-Assisted Compression Ignition single-cylinder engine, which supports a higher compression ratio (CR). For the first time, pure NH3 combustion was performed over a large range of engine operating conditions. The study concludes that neat ammonia can be used over a large operating range, here driven by the intake pressure, using a classical ignition device with a CR of 14-17 at 1000 rpm. The comparison with previous data obtained in a current single-cylinder SI engine clearly shows the potential of this engine mode, even for very low loads and various engine speeds (650, 1000, 2000 rpm), in spite of an initial aerodynamic that is not optimized to enhance flame-turbulence interaction. Kinetic simulations provide some explanations about exhaust emission behaviour, especially unburnt NH3, H-2, NOx and N2O.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available