Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.The learning curve of TaTME for mid-low rectal cancer: a comprehensive analysis from a five-year institutional experience
Roberto Persiani et al.
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES (2021)
The learning curve of transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer is associated with local recurrence: results from a multicentre external audit
Stefan E. Van Oostendorp et al.
COLORECTAL DISEASE (2021)
Total mesorectal excision for low and middle rectal cancer: laparoscopic versus transanal approach-a meta-analysis
Mathilde Aubert et al.
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES (2020)
Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer has been suspended in Norway
H. H. Wasmuth et al.
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (2020)
The ACPGBI recommends pause for reflection on transanal total mesorectal excision
N. S. Fearnhead et al.
COLORECTAL DISEASE (2020)
Local recurrence after local excision of early rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of completion TME, adjuvant (chemo)radiation, or no additional treatment
S. E. van Oostendorp et al.
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (2020)
Three-Year Nationwide Experience with Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer in the Netherlands: A Propensity Score-Matched Comparison with Conventional Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision
Robin Detering et al.
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS (2019)
Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) versus laparoscopic TME for MRI-defined low rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis of oncological outcomes
Sapho Xenia Roodbeen et al.
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES (2019)
Is trans-anal total mesorectal excision really safe and better than laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with a perineal approach first in patients with low rectal cancer? A learning curve with case-matched study in 68 patients
D. Mege et al.
COLORECTAL DISEASE (2018)
Effect of Robotic-Assisted vs Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery on Risk of Conversion to Open Laparotomy Among Patients Undergoing Resection for Rectal Cancer The ROLARR Randomized Clinical Trial
David Jayne et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2017)
Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection versus an open approach for low rectal cancer: a meta-analysis
Hanyu Chen et al.
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY (2017)
Rectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up
R. Glynne-Jones et al.
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY (2017)
COLOR III: a multicentre randomised clinical trial comparing transanal TME versus laparoscopic TME for mid and low rectal cancer
Charlotte L. Deijen et al.
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES (2016)
Transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of oncological and perioperative outcomes compared with laparoscopic total mesorectal excision
Bin Ma et al.
BMC CANCER (2016)
Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection of Stage II or III Rectal Cancer on Pathologic Outcomes The ACOSOG Z6051 Randomized Clinical Trial
James Fleshman et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2015)
Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection on Pathological Outcomes in Rectal Cancer The ALaCaRT Randomized Clinical Trial
Andrew R. L. Stevenson et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2015)
The Propensity Score
Jason S. Haukoos et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2015)
NOTES transanal rectal cancer resection using transanal endoscopic microsurgery and laparoscopic assistance
Patricia Sylla et al.
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES (2010)
Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery in patients with rectal cancer
J. Lujan et al.
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (2009)
The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies
Erik von Elm et al.
PLOS MEDICINE (2007)
Classification of surgical complications - A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey
D Dindo et al.
ANNALS OF SURGERY (2004)
Circumferential margin involvement is still an important predictor of local recurrence in rectal carcinoma - Not one millimeter but two millimeters is the limit
ID Nagtegaal et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY (2002)