4.5 Article

Can MRI pelvimetry predict the technical difficulty of laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery?

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE
Volume 36, Issue 12, Pages 2613-2620

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00384-021-04000-x

Keywords

Mesorectal excision; Rectal cancer; Pelvimetry; Magnetic resonance imaging

Funding

  1. Mitchell J Notaras Fellowship of the University of Sydney
  2. CSSANZ Training Board in Colorectal Surgery
  3. NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
  4. Australasian Gastro-Intestinal Trials Group (AGITG), Sydney, Australia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found no correlation between pelvic soft tissue measurements on preoperative MRI and surgical difficulty, but a strong association was observed between total pelvic volume and successful laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. Surgeons' intuitive prediction of surgical difficulty based on MRI assessment was not accurate.
Purpose Selection of an open or minimally invasive approach to total mesorectal excision (TME) is generally based on surgeon preference and an intuitive assessment of patient characteristics but there consensus on criteria to predict surgical difficulty. Pelvimetry has been used to predict the difficult surgical pelvis, typically using only bony landmarks. This study aimed to assess the relationship between pelvic soft tissue measurements on preoperative MRI and surgical difficulty. Methods Preoperative MRIs for patients undergoing laparoscopic rectal resection in the Australasian Laparoscopic Cancer of the Rectum Trial (ALaCaRT) were retrospectively reviewed by two blinded surgeons and pelvimetric variables measured. Pelvimetric variables were analyzed for predictors of successful resection of the rectal cancer, defined by clear circumferential and distal resection margins and completeness of TME. Results There was no association between successful surgery and any measurement of distance, area, or ratio. However, the was a strong association between the primary outcome and the estimated total pelvic volume on adjusted logistic regression analysis (OR = 0.99, P = 0.01). For each cubic centimeter increase in the pelvic volume, there was a 1% decrease in the odds of successful laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. Intuitive prediction of unsuccessful surgery was correct in 43% of cases, and correlation between surgeons was poor (ICC = 0.18). Conclusions A surgeon's intuitive assessment of the difficult pelvis, based on visible MRI assessment, is not a reliable predictor of successful laparoscopic surgery. Further assessment of pelvic volume may provide an objective method of defining the difficult surgical pelvis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available