4.3 Article

Circulating cell-free DNA in the peripheral blood plasma of patients is an informative biomarker for multiple myeloma relapse

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 26, Issue 11, Pages 2142-2150

Publisher

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s10147-021-01991-z

Keywords

Multiple Myeloma; Next generation sequencing; Liquid biopsy; Biomarker; Relapse

Categories

Funding

  1. Celgene Corporation
  2. A Bristol Myers Squibb Company
  3. Japanese Society of Hematology Research Grant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study showed that circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in the peripheral blood can serve as a biomarker for multiple myeloma (MM) relapse, detecting relapse more sensitively than conventional serum examination and potentially guiding early intervention.
Background Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable hematological malignancy. Despite the introduction of several novel drugs, most patients relapse. Biomarkers to identify the early signs of relapse will make it possible to adjust the therapeutic strategy before the disease worsens. Although understanding genetic changes is important for the treatment of MM, currently known biomarkers of relapse, including serum free-light chains and monoclonal paraproteins, are not associated with genetic changes. Methods We therefore performed a multicenter study to examine the usefulness of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) present in the peripheral blood (PB) plasma of patients as a biomarker for MM relapse. Results We identified several driver mutations by combined analysis of next-generation sequencing and existing databases of candidate oncogenes. Furthermore, relapse was detected more sensitively by monitoring the circulating cfDNA with these driver mutations than by conventional serum free-light chain examination. Conclusion These results suggest the potential utility of cfDNA in the PB plasma of patients as a relevant early biomarker for MM relapse.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available