Journal
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY
Volume 42, Issue 1, Pages 400-415Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/joc.7250
Keywords
CMIP5; LARS-WG; precipitation; RCPs; Shire Basin; temperature
Categories
Funding
- National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFC0401405]
- Tianjin Science and Technology Plan Project [18ZXSZSF00240]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study analyzed future temperature and precipitation projections in the Shire River Basin (SRB) in Malawi, finding a greater increase in temperatures. The future temperature changes showed higher uncertainties, while precipitation changes were more complex.
This study analyzes local-scale temperature and precipitation projections in the Shire River Basin (SRB) in Malawi using 10 global circulation models (GCMs) available in the coupled model intercomparison project phase 5 (CMIP5), under two representative concentration pathways (RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5). For nine stations in the study area, large-scale maximum temperature (Tmax), minimum temperature (Tmin) and precipitation data from the selected GCMs were downscaled by the sixth version of the Long Ashton Research Station Weather Generator (LARS-WG6). The mean seasonal and annual change projections for Tmax, Tmin and precipitation during two future periods, that is, the middle future (2041-2070) and late future (2071-2100) periods were analyzed. Modelling results demonstrated that the LARS-WG model is capable of simulating temperature more accurately than precipitation in the SRB. All 10 GCMs revealed that continually rising temperatures are anticipated in the study area; however, the projected magnitude of change varied across GCMs and between RCPs. Generally, the increase in average Tmax and Tmin was observed to be higher under RCP 8.5 compared with RCP 4.5 due to unmitigated greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs). Future precipitation change results showed more complexity and uncertainty than for temperature; not all GCMs agree on whether there will be positive or negative changes in precipitation and no systematic variations under RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 were observed during the two future time period, illustrating that both GCMs and RCPs are important sources of the relatively large uncertainties in future precipitation projections in the SRB. Thus, this study indicated that uncertainties constrained by both GCMs and RCPs are crucial and need to always be considered when executing climate impact studies and adaptation, particularly at river basin level.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available