4.2 Article

The influence of membrane electrode assembly's pressing on PEM fuel cell's performance

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL REACTOR ENGINEERING
Volume 19, Issue 10, Pages 1089-1101

Publisher

WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH
DOI: 10.1515/ijcre-2021-0065

Keywords

electrochemical reactor; fuel cell; MEA; PEM; pressing

Funding

  1. CSIC-UdelaR
  2. ANII
  3. PEDECIBA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The performance of a fuel cell depends on multiple factors, with the preparation of the membrane electrode assembly (MEA) being one of the most important. The study showed a significant dependence of charge transfer resistance on temperature, with pressure dependence being secondary. Changes in open circuit potential after varying temperature, pressure, and catalyst load were observed, affecting maximum power and efficiency.
The performance of a fuel cell depends on multiple factors, one of the most important being the preparation of the membrane electrode assembly (MEA). In the present work, MEAs constituted by gas diffuser electrodes (GDE) were pressed with carbon supported platinum catalysts. As solid electrolyte, a commercial polymeric membrane from Nafion was used, which was pressed at two GDE with loads of 5 and 1.5 mg/cm(2) of catalyst at different temperatures and pressures for a fixed period of time. The assembly was characterized electrochemically using linear sweep voltammetry and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy at three different potentials. Also, the behavior when reversing the supply of hydrogen and oxygen to the GDE was studied. The results of the study showed a great dependence of the charge transfer resistance with the temperature, being secondary the dependence with the pressure in the range of temperature and pressure analyzed. Likewise, changes were observed in the open circuit potential after varying the temperature, pressure and catalyst load, hence affecting its maximum power and efficiency at that point.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available