Journal
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 343, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.09.012
Keywords
Ischemic cardiomyopathy; Late gadolinium enhancement; Image noise; Artificial intelligence; Deep learning reconstruction
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The study found that applying NR reconstruction of at least 50% to 2D-MSLGE can provide better subjective image quality, CNR, and SNR in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy compared to 2D-SSLGE. Additionally, 2D-MSLGE showed superior image quality and similar diagnostic accuracy to 2D-SSLGE, with a significantly shorter acquisition time.
Background: Despite the low spatial resolution of 2D-multisegment late gadolinium enhancement (2D-MSLGE) sequences, it may be useful in uncooperative patients instead of standard 2D single segmented inversion recovery gradient echo late gadolinium enhancement sequences (2D-SSLGE). The aim of the study is to assess the feasibility and comparison of 2D-MSLGE reconstructed with artificial intelligence reconstruction deep learning noise reduction (NR) algorithm compared to standard 2D-SSLGE in consecutive patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM). Methods: Fifty-seven patients with known ICM referred for a clinically indicated CMR were enrolled in this study. 2D-MSLGE were reconstructed using a growing level of NR (0%,25%,50%,75%and 100%). Subjective image quality, signal to noise ratio (SNR) and contrast to noise ratio (CNR) were evaluated in each dataset and compared to standard 2D-SSLGE. Moreover, diagnostic accuracy, LGE mass and scan time were compared between 2D-MSLGE with NR and 2D-SSLGE. Results: The application of NR reconstruction >= 50% to 2D-MSLGE provided better subjective image quality, CNR and SNR compared to 2D-SSLGE (p < 0.01). The best compromise in terms of subjective and objective image quality was observed for values of 2D-MSLGE 75%, while no differences were found in terms of LGE quantification between 2D-MSLGE versus 2D-SSLGE, regardless the NR applied. The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value and accuracy of 2D-MSLGE NR 75% were 87.77%,96.27%,96.13%,88.16% and 94.22%, respectively. Time of acquisition of 2D-MSLGE was significantly shorter compared to 2D-SSLGE (p < 0.01). Conclusion: When compared to standard 2D-SSLGE, the application of NR reconstruction to 2D-MSLGE provides superior image quality with similar diagnostic accuracy.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available