4.7 Article

The importance of ethnicity: Are breast cancer polygenic risk scores ready for women who are not of White European origin?

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 150, Issue 1, Pages 73-79

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33782

Keywords

breast cancer; ethnicity; risk

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) BRC Manchester [1215-200074]
  2. Prevent Breast Cancer [GA19-002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PRS based on White European ethnicity for breast cancer risk assessment may overestimate risk for women of other ethnicities, particularly those of Black and Jewish origin. Developing ethnicity-specific PRS is urgently needed to expand the application of this technology.
Polygenic risk scores (PRS) for disease risk stratification show great promise for application in general populations, but most are based on data from individuals of White European origin. We assessed two well validated PRS (SNP18, SNP143) in the Predicting-Risk-of-Cancer-At-Screening (PROCAS) study in North-West England for breast cancer prediction based on ethnicity. Overall, 9475 women without breast cancer at study entry, including 645 who subsequently developed invasive breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ provided DNA. All were genotyped for SNP18 and a subset of 1868 controls were genotyped for SNP143. For White Europeans both PRS discriminated well between individuals with and without cancer. For n = 395 Black (n = 112), Asian (n = 119), mixed (n = 44) or Jewish (n = 120) women without cancer both PRS overestimated breast cancer risk, being most marked for women of Black and Jewish origin (P < .001). SNP143 resulted in a potential mean 40% breast cancer risk overestimation in the combined group of non-White/non-European origin. SNP-PRS that has been normalized based on White European ethnicity for breast cancer should not be used to predict risk in women of other ethnicities. There is an urgent need to develop PRS specific for other ethnicities, in order to widen access of this technology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available