4.3 Article

A Chronology of Ancient Earthquake Damage in the Modena Cathedral (Italy): Integrated Dating of Mortars (14C, Pollen Record) and Bricks (TL)

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURAL HERITAGE
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages 326-342

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15583058.2021.1922783

Keywords

Brick dating; chronology; earthquake damage; gypsum mortar; lime mortar dating; pollen

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines the vaults of the medieval Modena Cathedral in the 15th century, revealing the presence of different materials and multiple repair works over time. The findings provide valuable insights into the construction history and earthquake chronology of the cathedral, which are crucial for earthquake risk assessments and strengthening projects of ancient buildings.
The 15th century cross-vaults of the medieval Modena Cathedral (UNESCO site) consist of intricate patches of different masonry portions bound by three types of lime mortars and at least two types of gypsum mortars. Such anomalous structure suggests multiple repair works over time after damaging earthquakes. The absolute dating of lime mortars (C-14) and bricks (TL) integrated with the pollen record of mortars allowed to clarify the construction and restoration history of the vaults and to link the repairs to the earthquake chronology for the area. The results reveal that the original construction of the vaults (1404-1454) was carried out using lime mortar binding reused Roman and medieval older bricks. Lime mortar was used also for later repairs caused by earthquakes in the 16th and 17th centuries. Gypsum mortars were then used to entirely rebuild some vaults and to repair others in the 18th and 19th centuries. The study indicates that unexpected damage could be revealed by the detailed chronology of masonry binders. These data represent fundamental steps to implement earthquake risk assessments and strengthening projects of ancient buildings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available